Skip to content

Research Brief

Any question, answered with the evidence and every source.

  • G
  • M
  • D
On demand · 1 minute setup

Preview

Sample output · example data

Sample output, example data. All names, numbers, sources, and links are fictional and only show what the skill produces.

Should a 12-person team move from spreadsheets to a dedicated CRM this year?

Research brief · Saturday, October 31, 2026 · 12 sources · Confidence: medium

Bottom line

Yes, if the team runs more than about 40 active deals at a time or loses track of follow-ups. Below that, a well-structured shared spreadsheet still works for most small teams, and the switch mainly pays off when two or more people touch the same accounts [1][4].

Key findings

  1. Missed follow-ups are the main cost of spreadsheets. Two surveys of small sales teams found that untracked follow-ups, not data entry, were the most-cited reason for switching [1][3].
  2. Adoption decides the outcome. Teams that picked a tool with fewer features and trained everyone in week one reported higher use after six months [2][5].
  3. Setup takes longer than vendors suggest. Independent reviewers report 3–6 weeks to migrate and clean data for a team this size, versus the "one afternoon" in vendor marketing [4][7].

Where sources disagree

  • Whether built-in automation saves time early on: vendor case studies say yes [6]; an independent study found most small teams didn't use automations until month four [2].

What we still don't know

  • How the newest AI note-taking features affect data quality. No independent study yet.

If you're deciding

  • Count your active deals and shared accounts this week. If either is over the thresholds above, run a 30-day trial with two tools, both with your real data.

Sources

  1. Example Small Business Institute, "Why Teams Switch", Example Research, Mar 2026. https://example.com/sample/1
  2. J. Okonkwo et al., "Tool Adoption in Small Firms", Example Journal of Management, Jan 2026. https://example.com/sample/2
  3. Example Sales Survey 2026, Example Analytics, Jun 2026. https://example.com/sample/3
  4. "We Tested Six CRMs With Real Data", Example Review, Aug 2026. https://example.com/sample/4

(Sources 5–12 omitted in this preview.)

What you get

5 things · A 2–3 sentence bottom line with a confidence rating
  • A 2–3 sentence bottom line with a confidence rating
  • Key findings, each tied to numbered sources
  • Where credible sources disagree
  • Open questions and practical next steps
  • A full source list with dates and links

Make it yours

5 settings · Depth, Source types, Format, Written for, Recency
Depth
  • Quick (5–8 sources)
  • Standard (10–15 sources) (default)
  • Deep (20+ sources)
Source types
  • News (default)
  • Academic papers (default)
  • Official data (default)
  • Company filings (default)
  • Expert blogs (default)
  • Forums
Format
  • Brief (default)
  • Comparison table
  • One-page memo
Written for
  • Me (default)
Recency
  • Any time (default)
  • Last 12 months
  • Last 30 days

Defaults are highlighted. It asks once on the first run.

Data sources

1 required · Web search
  • Web search

About

Ask a real question, such as whether to switch tools, what the evidence…

Ask a real question, such as whether to switch tools, what the evidence says about a treatment, or how a market is shifting, and get back a brief you could forward to your boss. Research Brief searches widely, reads the sources it cites, weighs who has a stake in the answer, and tells you plainly where experts disagree. Every claim carries a numbered citation, and it says how confident it is and why.

Research Brief

Install

Full steps and safety notes →